Abilene Paradox

What is Abilene Paradox?

The Abilene Paradox is a state wherein a collective decision is made by a group that contradicts the thoughts and feelings of its individual members. It occurs because of the individuals who don't wish to ‘rock the boat,’ although their perceptions regarding the other members’ thoughts aren’t always right.

Even though one of the team member does not find the proposal a good fit, he don’t express his genuine opinions. Due to the fear of probable negative consequences or the desire to preserve the group’s harmony. This results in the team beginning to act on disagreements or inaccurate data. The teammate who proposed the action may be unsure if it is the right choice. However, when no other teammate expresses a difference in opinion, it leads to poor decision-making.

For example, An application development team of a company had its daily meeting.

• The head of the department and the other members came to a decision about working an hour extra each week to reach the deadlines.
• Opinions from team members were taken. One of the member was not willing to work an hour extra.
• But he went with the flow and agreed to the decision rather than expressing his real thoughts and placing his individual opinion.
• Due to this, he was caught in the ‘Abilene Paradox’.

How to Prevent Abilene Paradox in Organization?

Abilene Paradox leads to unsatisfactory results and decisions, and that is when the organization will start facing the consequences.

The major factor giving rise to such a situation is when the leader possesses the character of being adamant and announces his decision early without giving other teammates a chance to raise their opinions. Instead, the leader should keep his idea at the end after gathering inputs from other teammates. Also, they should never disregard other opinions altogether.

Every member of the team should be allowed to suggest, discuss, and work on the ideas. It will create a positive culture where employees are interested in representing themselves without having fear of losing job or identity and not following the herd.

Besides, it is not fair to put the pressure of team action and responsibility over a single person (group leader in case of this paradox), but every individual member should participate in problem solving. Confronting and expressing ideas will prevent anti-social behavior and group tyranny.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Abilene Paradox differ from Groupthink?

On the whole, both the situations are similar with only one difference.

In groupthink, all the individuals participate collectively for a discussion as a cohesive group. They altogether agree with the group’s final decision both individually and as a team.

On the contrary, in abilene paradox, the individual members agree with the decision as a team so that they don’t upset anyone in the group. But their personal thoughts don't match or are opposite from the collective decision.

What are the symptoms of abilene paradox?

Your organization is caught into abilene when the employees in a group shows the below symptoms.

• Employees agree about individual problems or organizational losses privately but not in a group discussion.
• Employees fear to suggest steps needed to resolve an issue collectively but do so one-on-one.
• Due to fear of isolation and miscommunication, their thoughts are really expressed well. Their actual and private opinions always differ from what they agreed to as a team.
• Decisions taken in the influence of paradox are often poor, which may result in failure of the action. Employees, thus feel anger, frustration and dissatisfaction towards the organization.
• Employees with similar thoughts may start creating micro-groups and target other groups for downfalls.